1. Grasp the thumb metacarpal shaft
2. Move the thumb in a circular motion
3. Apply axial compression
4. Alternative thumb subluxation of the arthritic CMC joint is firmly reduced
to reproduce the patient symptoms.
Citation
Sensitivity*
Specificity†
PPV‡
NPV§
Merritt et al. (2010)3
42%, 53%
80%, 93%
91%, 96%
68%, 70%
*Sensitivity: true positive rate; proportion of actual positives that are correctly identified as such. The two values shown for the Merritt et al. study are values for two examiners.
†Specificity: true negative rate; proportion of actual negatives that are correctly identified as such. The two values shown for the Merritt et al. study are values for two examiners.
‡Positive predictive value (PPV): measure of precision; true positives / total number of positives (depends on prevalence). The two values shown for the Merritt et al. study are values for two examiners.
§Negative predictive value (NPV): true negatives / total number of negatives (depends on prevalence).
Note: the 2 values shown for each parameter are values for 2 examiners.
1. Rayan G and Akelman E. The Hand: Anatomy, Examination, and Diagnosis. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.
2. Culp R and Jacoby S. Musculoskeletal Examination of the Elbow, Wrist, and Hand: Making the Complex Simple. Thorofare: Slack Inc., 2012.
3. Merritt M et al Diagnostic value of clinical grind test for carpometacarpal osteoarthritis of the thumb. J Hand Ther 2010; 23(3): 261-7. PMID: 20452743
4. Dias R, et al. Basal thumb arthritis. Postgrad Med 2007; 83(975): 40–43. PMID: 17267677
5 . Choa R Parvizi N, Giele H. A prospective case-control study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the grind and traction-shift (subluxation-relocation) clinical tests in osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Eur 2014;39(3):282-5. PMID: 24127463